Fat vs. Sonhood vs. Ricochet vs. Channel vs. Trending Comparisons. Mandate vs. Ivermectin vs. Skinwalker vs. Socialism vs. Man vs. Supersonic vs. Gazelle vs. Jem vs. Mouse vs. Lubuntu vs. You vs. Virtual vs. Featured Comparisons Guidence vs. Togather vs. Maintenance vs. Brachycardia vs. Villainize vs. Catagory vs. Correspondance vs. Incentivise vs.
How large was their family? What would be most appropriate? Talk with their family members and friends to determine what they would have liked, and think about the logistics of your choice. If you are planning a funeral service and you need a personalized gravestone, speak with the professionals at Custom Monument in Rockingham, NC. These monuments were so large that it took thousands of people to build them. During the past two hundred years monuments have become famous landmarks of cities.
Planned cities have often been built around man-made structures. The Washington Monument was built before the planning and construction of the city started. Over history big structures have been built for many other purposes. Memorials and monuments punctuate our lives. Many of us are taught to revere them early on—in town squares, at museums, throughout our national parks, and everywhere in between. We may repeat the ritual with our own children, who may someday bury us beneath smaller though no less meaningful monuments.
All the while, we live our lives before the silent gaze of granite soldiers, towering obelisks, historic buildings, roadside crucifixes, memorial bridges, and no end of scattered mementos. Some of them were left by ancestors for reasons that may be obscured by time.
Some appear as if overnight, often born of grief for a loved one lost to violence or disregard. People have given their lives in the service of monuments; others have killed to protect them. But what do we really know about these silent sentinels? They have, rather, since the beginning of our national saga, witnessed and prompted impassioned dissent, vocal nationalism, and sometimes lethal violence. We know too from decades of scholarship that memorials and monuments trade in all matter of perceptual trickery.
Choices made about which of these memories to enshrine, and which ones to erase, are the messages that memorials and monuments convey today. In this sense, then, memorials are never silent, and they certainly do not reflect consensus. They are rather arguments about the past presented as if there were no argument.
We need monuments, even despite their tendency to misrepresent. At their best, monuments can bind us together and fortify our communities in the face of tragedy or uncertainty.
They can also remind us that to be great is worthy of aspiration. The meaning of greatness, however, is never fixed. Indeed, how we define it—how, that is, we choose to remember—has become a matter of pointed concern, especially as Americans seek to expand opportunity among those whose forebears were so long erased from public memory. Is there such a thing as a public memorial that respects the infinite diversity of the American public? Making sense of our monument wars and their history is complicated by the variety of words that are used, often interchangeably, to describe them.
Historians study memory, as do neuroscientists, physiologists, physicists, sociologists, philosophers, and others besides. Historians cannot make sense of memory alone. In the United States, for instance, leading memory scholars—including Michael Kammen, David Blight, James Young, and Erika Doss—have advanced a set of propositions, drawn from an array of social and cultural theory, that explain how memory promotes a common sense of American identity over time and across lines of difference.
There is also the notion that memory can reside in objects and places, and that attending to these is one way that nations sustain our loyalties. Running through all of this is an awareness that, if we listen closely, monuments can speak volumes about the intent of their makers.
0コメント